Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Richart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 8791PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Complaint by the appellant against the appellees, as administrators of the estate of Reuben Dewart, upon two promissory notes, each for $300, alleged to have been made by the deceased. The circuit court overruled demurrers to the sixth and seventh paragraphs of the appellees’ answer ; and on these rulings the appellant has assigned error. These paragraphs are not essentially different; we, therefore, give the substance of the sixth only, which is to the effect following:

That Reuben Dewart, during his lifetime, entered into a contract with Mary E. Gibson and Harlan Gibson, for the purchase of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Clark v. SigourneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  3. Shuler v. HardinIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Small v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Coleman v. HartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Horner v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Miller v. KempSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Creekmore v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Wimberg v. SchwegemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API