Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Thirty-Sixth District Court Judge

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1994No. Docket 144965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, J.

Defendant, 36th District Court Judge John Cozart, appeals as of right from a circuit court order granting a writ of superintending control. The writ instructed Judge Cozart, inter alia, to accommodate attorneys and litigants whose matters have been scheduled simultaneously in different courtrooms in the real estate division of the 36th District Court. We affirm.

i

Steve Lockhart, an attorney for the United Community Housing Coalition, brought the action. He alleged that on December 20, 1990, another attorney approached him to adjourn the hearing on a motion to set aside a default judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Recorder's Court Bar Ass'n v. Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re Lafayette TowersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Michigan Basic Property Insurance v. Hackert Furniture Distributing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Board of Library Commissioners v. Judges of the 70th District CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bennett v. WeitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Smith v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Baraga County v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re Lapeer County ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API