Legal Opinion

Smith v. Henry Ford Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 2, 1997No. Docket 184333PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s order ruling that the appointment of a personal representative for the estate of Harvey Gardner should relate back to the filing of the complaint. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. On March 9, 1994, a complaint was filed alleging that defendants negligently failed to diagnose the prostate cancer of the named plaintiff, Harvey Gardner. On March 10, 1994, an amended complaint was filed, which added a claim for loss of consortium on behalf of plaintiff Carol…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hyde v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. LaBar v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Maiuri v. Sinacola Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Castle v. Lockwood-MacDonald HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bennett v. WeitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Szymanski v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Tinman v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Doyle v. Hutzel HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API