Legal Opinion

Opsomere v. Opsomere

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1910No. Docket No. 19PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Replevin by Leander Opsomere against Alex Opsomere. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is an action in replevin, brought by plaintiff, aged 86 years, against his son, 40 years of age, to obtain possession of a team of horses, some harness, a wagon, plow, land roller, and a harrow, which the plaintiff claimed to own, and to be entitled to the possession of, at the time the writ issued. The case was tried before the circuit court of Bay county, and a verdict was directed in favor of defendant, on the ground that at the time suit was commenced defendant, under the agreement between the parties, was entitled to the possession of the property. Plaintiff has brought the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wattles v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Freese v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Opsomere v. OpsomereMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API