Wattles v. Dubois
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Pealer, J., presiding.) Keplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On the fifteenth day of April, 1885, the plaintiff let a farm on shares to defendant. The plaintiff was to furnish half of the seed necessary and used by defendant in farming the land, and one-half of the live-stock which by mutual agreement the parties deemed necessary and advantageous to be kept upon the land, except such teams as defendant might furnish for working and farming said land. Plaintiff was also to pay the taxes, etc. Defendant was to work the land, and deliver to plaintiff in the city of Kala. mazoo, as rent for said land, one-half of all crops raised *314thereon. The agreement was…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bolton v. NitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Collier v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Pingree v. SteereMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Adams v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Opsomere v. OpsomereMichigan Supreme Court · 1910