Legal Opinion

Mandan Deaconess Hospital v. County of Sioux

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1933No. File Nos. 6083, 6084PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.

Two actions, one brought to recover for hospital services and one to recover for professional services of a physician rendered to a resident of Sioux county, were brought against the County of Sioux and by stipulation tried together. A jury trial was waived and in each action findings of fact and conclusions of law were made favorable to the plaintiff. Erom judgments for $651.95 and costs and $483.33 and costs, respectively, and from orders denying judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, the defendant has appealed. The cases were argued together in this court and both may be properly treated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bauman v. McManusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Hamlin County v. Clark CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Roane v. Hutchinson CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Robbins v. Town of HomerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Independence, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Trinity Hospital Association v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sisters of Mercy v. Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Board of Com'rs of Noble County v. NiemannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API