Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Town of Homer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1905No. Nos. 14,308—(68)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Winona county dismissing the action, entered pursuant to the order of Snow, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This is an action against a town having legal charge of a pauper to recover for his medical and surgical treatment furnished by a physician. There was a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained, and judgment ordered dismissing the action. This appeal is from that judgment.

It is set forth that Richard Ressard was a resident of the town of Homer, and for a period of five years prior thereto had a legal settlement therein; that the plaintiff, a physician, rendered surgical and medical treatment for Ressard, who had had no means of support for more than one year prior thereto, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Enid Springs Sanitarium & HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. DenebrinkWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Miller v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gillies v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  5. Hendrickson v. Town of QueenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API