Legal Opinion
St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 2, 2008No. Civil Action 05-2115 (CKK)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
On January 25, 2003, a tee fitting froze and burst in the dry sprinkler system at the Kellogg Conference Center on the campus of Gallaudet University (“Gallau-det”) in Washington, D.C., causing significant water damage. This case is about who is legally responsible for the damage. Plaintiff St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St.Paul”) was Gallaudet’s property insurer, and has been subrogated for Gal-laudet in this litigation. St. Paul filed suit against Defendant Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. (“Capitol Sprinkler”), the company…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Millennium Square Residential Association v. 2200 M Street LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Johnson v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ng v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.