Legal Opinion
Idaho Department of Health v. Holjeson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 31, 1985No. 6567-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.
—Bryan Holjeson appeals the denial of his motion to vacate an Idaho judgment for child support arrearages, claiming the underlying cause of action was barred under Washington's statute of limitation and was also subject to the defense of res judicata. We affirm.
The Holjesons were divorced in Idaho in 1967. Mr. Hol-jeson's former wife was granted custody of their three children. She later instituted several actions in Idaho against Mr. Holjeson, a Washington resident, under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), RCW 26.21. The last action in 1982 pertained to back support.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rankin v. FerriterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jung Sup Lee v. Tcast Communications, Inc. ( in Re Jung Sup Lee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Effert v. KalupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- In Re Estate of SteinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- SONNTAG REPORTING v. CiccarelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- TCAP CORP. v. GervinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.