Legal Opinion
Barker v. Skagit Speedway, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 28, 2003No. 50458-4-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Absent evidence that the premises owned and operated by Skagit Speedway, Inc., were not reasonably safe, that warnings were inadequate, or that Skagit Speedway, Inc., was alerted to a foreseeable risk or danger, there was no duty to protect Robert Barker from the actions of race participants after the conclusion of racing.
FACTS
Skagit Speedway, Inc. (hereinafter Skagit Speedway) owns and operates an oval dirt automobile racetrack known as the Skagit Speedway. In 1999, the pit area was located in the center of the track. Skagit Speedway conducts sprint car races at the speedway on weekends and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Millson v. City of LyndenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Barker v. Skagit Speedway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Barker v. Skagit Speedway, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Kristen Carney And Steven Carney v. Meagan NorrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Lori Tinsley v. Sharon B. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.