Legal Opinion

Millson v. City of Lynden

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 1, 2013No. 67931-7-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 — A municipality has a duty to pedestrians using its sidewalks to keep the sidewalks reasonably safe for their intended use.1 Generally “ ‘[a] pedestrian on a sidewalk who has no knowledge to the contrary may proceed on the assumption that the city has performed its full duty and has kept the sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition . . . ”2 Nor is a pedestrian “required to keep his eyes on the walk immediately in front of him at all times.”3 And the fact that there is an offset that a pedestrian could *307see if he looked “does not constitute . . . negligence as a matter of law unless there is…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Downham v. ArbuckleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Verl Lee Et Al., Respondents, v. Willis Enterprises, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Anne Block And Noel Frederick v. City Of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Daniel v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Justin Helmbreck v. Paula McpheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API