Millson v. City of Lynden
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 — A municipality has a duty to pedestrians using its sidewalks to keep the sidewalks reasonably safe for their intended use.1 Generally “ ‘[a] pedestrian on a sidewalk who has no knowledge to the contrary may proceed on the assumption that the city has performed its full duty and has kept the sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition . . . ”2 Nor is a pedestrian “required to keep his eyes on the walk immediately in front of him at all times.”3 And the fact that there is an offset that a pedestrian could *307see if he looked “does not constitute . . . negligence as a matter of law unless there is…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Downham v. ArbuckleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Verl Lee Et Al., Respondents, v. Willis Enterprises, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Anne Block And Noel Frederick v. City Of Gold BarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Daniel v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Justin Helmbreck v. Paula McpheeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.