Sinkiewicz v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Parker, J.,
The judgment entered below is attacked on the grounds that there was not any evidence to support the finding that there had been an accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act and that causal connection was not shown between the alleged accident and death. More specifically, it is claimed by appellants that there was no evidence of the presence of poisonous gas, the alleged cause of death, at the location where decedent was working; that if there were gases present, their inhalation did not constitute an accident and was not shown to have been the cause…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. Yough Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- O'Neill v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Matis v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Todd v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Clemens v. CornishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Woodcraft & Foundry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Loudon v. H. W. Shaull & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Troxell v. ShirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Rosenfeld v. Coleman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1959