Legal Opinion
National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Department of State
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 14, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-0627 (HHG), 91-1101 and 91-0564PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are several motions concerning the right of Republic of Turkey to demolish its existing chancery building in the District of Columbia and construct a new and larger one. Several historic preservation groups, Concerned Citizens for Kalorama, Inc., Sheridan-Kalorama Histori cal Association and the National Trust for Historic Preservation (“plaintiffs” or “Sheridan-Kalorama”), oppose the proposed demolition and expansion, and have moved for summary judgment. At the center of the plaintiffs’ complaint is the alleged non-compliance…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- John Doe v. William J. Casey, Director, C.I.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sheridan Kalorama Historical Ass'n v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Sheridan Kalorama Historical Association v. Warren ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Historic Green Springs, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010