Legal Opinion

Furfaro v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 27, 1999No. 43409-8-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

The First Amendment protects nonobscene nude dance performances in an adult nightclub. Before making arrests for violations of a standards of conduct ordinance that prohibits stage dancers from sexual self-touching during a performance, a municipality must obtain a judicial determination of probable cause in which the court is able to focus searchingly on the question of obscenity. Without a warrant, such arrests operate as a prior restraint and a form of unconstitutional censorship. The appellants’ federal civil rights damage claim is reinstated and allowed to proceed on the theory that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Furfaro v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Furfaro v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Furfaro v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API