Legal Opinion
Furfaro v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 2001No. 68971-7PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Guy, J.*
— Petitioner the City of Seattle (City) seeks review of a decision by the Court of Appeals, Division One, in Furfaro v. City of Seattle, 97 Wn. App. 537, 551, 984 P.2d 1055 (1999), which held that the warrantless arrests of *366respondents Nick Furfaro, Brandy Kidder, and Esmeralda Silva (Respondents) based on the nude dancers’ alleged violation of Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) 6.270.100(A)(2) violated their rights afforded by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. After one of the defendant dancers was acquitted and the charges against the remaining…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Furfaro v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Donna Zink & Jeff Zink v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Alexis, Inc. v. Pinellas County, FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Andrea S. Jarmon v. Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- City of Seattle v. Furfaro and Furfaro v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.