Legal Opinion · Dissent

Powell v. Dicksion

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 25, 2012No. 107,295Published

1Dissent

WINCHESTER, J.,

with whom TAYLOR, C.J., COLBERT, V.C.J. and COMBS, J. join, dissenting:

1 1 I respectfully dissent. Contrary to the doctrine of stare decisis, the majority opinion overrules In re King, 1990 OK 138, 837 P.2d 463, and In re Geller, 1999 OK CIV APP 45, 980 P.2d 665. King construed § 215(d) of title 84.1 The statute provides in pertinent part that for inheritance purposes, a child born out of wedlock stands in identical relation to his father and his kindred, and the latter and his kindred to the child whenever "the father was judicially determined to be such in a paternity…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. R.R. Tway, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Lasiter v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Casey v. SelfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Matter of Estate of KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API