Legal Opinion

Sykes v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 26, 1998No. C1-97-1554PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant argues that the postconviction court erred when it denied him relief. Appellant claims that his convictions for felony terroristic threats should be vacated because the district court lacked jurisdiction; that his guilty plea was not made voluntarily, and that there was no factual basis to support his guilty plea. He also claims that his petition for postconviction relief was timely. We affirm.

FACTS

Sykes is an English law student and 13-year former member of Eckankar, a nonprofit cult-like religious organization that has a church in Chanhassen. On September 19,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. SchweppeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. State v. SimionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. VergilioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. State v. FranksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Black v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API