Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vergilio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2014No. 2628 EDA 2013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PLATT, J.:

The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s order granting the petition of Appellee, Frank Vergilio, to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, the court dismissed the charges of terroristic threats 1 based on its finding that it lacked jurisdiction because the alleged threats from Appellee originated from a telephone in New Jersey and were directly received by the victim in Pennsylvania. We reverse.

As observed by the trial court:

[Tjhere is no dispute that the telephone calls at issue were made from New Jersey. [Appellee] and the victim had two communications…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. RandallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Com. v. Campbell, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Amended June 22, 2016 State of Iowa v. Demetrius S. Rimmer v. Rona Murphy v. Melonicka ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API