Legal Opinion
Mastin v. Fellerhoff
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 13, 1981No. C-1-81-709PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This case is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 12), defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 13), and plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition to defendants’ motion (doc. 14). Time has passed for any additional filings under Local Rule 4.0.2, so the motions are ripe for judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we find that plaintiffs’ motion is well taken and should be granted; defendants’ motion should be denied.
This…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Dubinka v. Judges of the Superior Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Anthony v. CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.