Legal Opinion
Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 8, 1994No. 92-55736PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 F.3d 218
Michael DUBINKA; John F. Coleman; Raul Meza, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
JUDGES OF the SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA for
the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Daniel Lungren, Attorney General
of the State of California; Ira Reiner, District Attorney
of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-55736.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 1993.
Decided April 8, 1994.
Henry J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Frederick R. Bennett, Asst. County Counsel, Donald E. de Nicola, Deputy Attorney Gen., Los Angeles, CA,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- G.C. And K.B. Investments, Inc., a Louisiana Corporation v. Stuart Wilson Irene WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ricotta v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998
- In Re Audre, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Yelp Inc. v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Scripsamerica, Inc. v. Ironridge Global LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.