Gloria O'Neill and Jim L. O'Neil v. Great Plains Women's Clinic, Inc. A Professional Corporation Burt C. Montague
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
On stipulation of the parties and after examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiffs Gloria O’Neil and Jim L. O’Neil timely appeal from an adverse judgment in this diversity action. After trial to a jury, judgment was entered against them on Mrs. O’Neil’s malpractice claim for injuries to her and Mr. O’Neil’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Runyon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Delano v. KitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Homer Reeg v. Dr. Dennis M. Shaughnessy and Jack D. Fetzer, M.D., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Gustavo A. Pesantes, Jr., as Administrator of the Succession of Gustavo Adolph Pesantes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Moses v. Proctor Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaiser-Francis Oil Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Producer's Gas Company, a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Wilson v. Al McCord Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Spencer by and Through Spencer v. SeikelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Doyle v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.