Legal Opinion

Spencer by and Through Spencer v. Seikel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 21, 1987No. 63310PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

On October 14, 1981 plaintiff/appellant, hereinafter “patient”, engaged the services of defendant/appellee, hereinafter “doctor”, for prenatal care relative to her third pregnancy. During the course of treatment, on December 16,1981, doctor discovered fetus was suffering from hydrocephalus, a condition which results from the backing up of cerebrospinal fluid into the brain ventricles. This condition usually produces retardation of brain development.

Patient gave birth to the plaintiff/appellant child in the spring of 1982. The child was bom with virtually no brain. He is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  3. Sheeley v. Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  4. Grayson v. State Ex Rel. Children's Hospital of OklahomaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Goss v. Oklahoma Blood InstituteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API