Spencer by and Through Spencer v. Seikel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
On October 14, 1981 plaintiff/appellant, hereinafter “patient”, engaged the services of defendant/appellee, hereinafter “doctor”, for prenatal care relative to her third pregnancy. During the course of treatment, on December 16,1981, doctor discovered fetus was suffering from hydrocephalus, a condition which results from the backing up of cerebrospinal fluid into the brain ventricles. This condition usually produces retardation of brain development.
Patient gave birth to the plaintiff/appellant child in the spring of 1982. The child was bom with virtually no brain. He is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Sheeley v. Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Grayson v. State Ex Rel. Children's Hospital of OklahomaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Goss v. Oklahoma Blood InstituteCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.