Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1989No. Nos. 86-2236, 86-2309PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Michael L. Doyle brought this action against Trinity Savings & Loan Association (Trinity) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) asserting that he is entitled to damages and cancellation of a note and real estate mortgage as a result of the fraudulent alteration of the note. Judgment was entered for Doyle on all *559claims. Both defendants appeal, and we affirm.1
The relevant undisputed facts are briefly as follows. Doyle executed an adjustable rate promissory note in favor of Trinity, secured by a real estate mortgage with an attached adjustable rate rider.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shepherd Mall State Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Dill v. RaderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Gloria O'Neill and Jim L. O'Neil v. Great Plains Women's Clinic, Inc. A Professional Corporation Burt C. MontagueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Holliman v. Ed Grier Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Michael L. Doyle v. Trinity Savings and Loan Association, Tsl Service Corporation Stm Mortgage Company, and Federal National Mortgage Association, Michael L. Doyle v. Trinity Savings and Loan Association, Tsl Service Corporation, Stm Mortgage Company, and Federal National Mortgage AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989