Legal Opinion

United States v. Profeta

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 27, 2009No. Criminal No. 1990-0449Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) Criminal Acti0n No. 90-449(RCL) v. ) ) MIGUEL PROFETA, ) ) Defendant. ) j MEMORANDUM Defendant Miguel Profeta’s motion [Dkt. 134] to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2255

is before this Court. After reviewing the petitioner’s motion the entire record therein, and applicable law, the Court will DENY the petitioner’s § 2255 motion. I. BACKGROUND The petitioner pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to continuing a criminal drug enterprise, in violation of 21…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.