James Lee Hayles v. Ray E. Loper Lumber Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BRADLEY, Judge.
The plaintiffs in the court below, petitioners here, filed a complaint seeking benefits under Alabama’s Workmen’s Compensation Act. The defendant demurred to the complaint, plaintiffs amended their complaint, and defendant answered the amended complaint.
Trial was had before the court, sitting without a jury. There were findings of fact made by the court and a final judgment entered thereon holding that the plaintiffs were not dependent on James Andrew Hayles on the date of his death.
The plaintiffs thereupon petitioned the Supreme Court to review this judgment by Writ of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- National Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Hamilton Motor Co. v. CoonerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Queen City Furniture Company v. HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hayles v. Ray E. Loper Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Hopper v. Hale Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990