Legal Opinion

Cross v. Bonded Adjustment Bureau

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1996No. B087247PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MASTERSON, J.

Plaintiffs Billy and Delores Cross retained Bonded Adjustment Bureau (Bonded), a collection agency, to enforce a judgment in the principal amount of approximately $150,000. Based on Bonded’s advice, the Crosses gave the judgment debtor a full satisfaction of judgment in exchange for $40,000.

Later, the Crosses brought this action against Bonded and others, alleging that defendants had engaged in wrongful conduct in attempting to collect on the judgment. The second amended complaint contained causes of action for negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tekle Ex Rel. Tekle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Hac v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. LutnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Duronslet v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API