Legal Opinion

Sproule v. Coursey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 2016No. CV091183; A151768PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Petitioner appeals a judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We write only to address petitioner’s second assignment of error, in which he contends that relief should have been granted because his criminal trial counsel was inadequate for failing to object to the use of a leg brace to restrain petitioner during the trial, and reject the remaining assignments of error without discussion. On review for errors of law, Green v. Franke, 357 Or 301, 312, 350 P3d 188 (2015), we conclude that petitioner was not prejudiced by any inadequacy in counsel’s failure to object to the use…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Green v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larsen v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Madrigal-Estrella v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Baranovich v. BrockampWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. Clark v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Lankford v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API