Harsha v. Anastos
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
This appeal concerns the application of the “clean hands” rule to proceedings to quiet title to certain real property claimed by appellants under the doctrine of adverse possession. The district court refused to enforce appellants’ interest in the property on the ground that their “unfair acts” precluded equitable relief. Accordingly, the court restored possession of the disputed property to appellee, the title holder of record.
We affirm.
FACTS
Appellee Marcella Anastos and appellants Ronald and Sharon Harsha reside on adjoining tracts of land in Green River, Wyoming, with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Pine Creek Canal No. 1 v. StadlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
- Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. SchleicherWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fremont Homes, Inc. v. ElmerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Foster v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Walters v. MichelWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Roussalis v. Apollo Electric Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.