Legal Opinion

Roussalis v. Apollo Electric Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1999No. 98-166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

John E. Roussalis II (Roussalis) appeals from a judgment entered by the district court in favor of Apollo Electric Co. (Apollo).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Roussalis presents four issues for consideration:

1. Did the trial court err in awarding unjust enrichment damages in the amount of $73,930.08 where the Appellee sued for breach of contract and accepted the benefit of a $43,673.15 partial summary judgment under breach of contract theory?

2. Did the trial court err in awarding unjust enrichment damages in light of Ap-pellee’s unclean hands?

3. Did the trial court err in the measure of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fox v. F & J Gattozzi Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. SchleicherWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Harsha v. AnastosWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cherie Davidson-Eaton v. Christy Iversen and Susan D. Kirk, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Gale S. IversenWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Katya Hutton v. Michael L. Dykes and J. Christopher Dykes, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Robert P. DykesWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Montierth v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Dobson v. Portrait Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dobson v. Portrait Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API