Roussalis v. Apollo Electric Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
John E. Roussalis II (Roussalis) appeals from a judgment entered by the district court in favor of Apollo Electric Co. (Apollo).
We affirm.
ISSUES
Roussalis presents four issues for consideration:
1. Did the trial court err in awarding unjust enrichment damages in the amount of $73,930.08 where the Appellee sued for breach of contract and accepted the benefit of a $43,673.15 partial summary judgment under breach of contract theory?
2. Did the trial court err in awarding unjust enrichment damages in light of Ap-pellee’s unclean hands?
3. Did the trial court err in the measure of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Fox v. F & J Gattozzi Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Springer v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Dutch Maid Bakeries, Inc. v. SchleicherWyoming Supreme Court · 1942
- Harsha v. AnastosWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cherie Davidson-Eaton v. Christy Iversen and Susan D. Kirk, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Gale S. IversenWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Katya Hutton v. Michael L. Dykes and J. Christopher Dykes, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Robert P. DykesWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
- Montierth v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Dobson v. Portrait Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Dobson v. Portrait Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005