Legal Opinion

Shealy v. Shealy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for construction of a deed. The deed with the circuit decree will be reported.

So much of the decree as adjudges that, by the granting clause, a fee-simple estate is conveyed to Thompson E. Shealy, which cannot be cut down by subsequent clauses of the deed, is affirmed. Glenn v. Jamison: 48 S. C., 316; 26 S. E., 677. Adams v. Verner: 102 S. C., 7; 86 S. E., 211. The application of the rule in Shelley’s case to the habendum clause need not be considered.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Glenn v. JamisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. GlasgowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Cresswell v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Stylecraft, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. SmoakSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. United States v. 31,600 Acres of LandDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API