Legal Opinion
Top-All Varieties, Inc. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 10, 1969No. 68 Civ. 4132PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDERICK VAN PELT BRYAN, District Judge:
Defendants, Hallmark Cards, Inc. (Hallmark) and Tarrytown Stationers, Inc. (Stationers) move pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) F.R.C.P. to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendants have not answered and the motion is addressed to the face of the complaint.
The complaint, laid under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., in substance alleges the following:
Plaintiff, Top-All Varieties, Inc. (Top-All) is in the business of leasing, equipping, stocking and franchising retail stores under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Packard Motor Car Company v. The Webster Motor Car Company, the Webster Motor Car Company v. Packard Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oreck Corporation v. Whirlpool Corporation and Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Beckman v. Walter Kidde & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- Gte Sylvania Incorporated v. Continental T v. Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Quality Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.