Legal Opinion

Barr v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 7, 1989No. 87 Civ. 6259(KC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONBOY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendant McGraw-Hill, Inc. and others for common law and securities fraud, and breach of contract. McGraw-Hill now moves (i) to dismiss the fraud claims for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), (ii) to strike the demand for “benefit-of-the-bargain” damages in the fraud claims, and (iii) for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim on the ground that it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Denny v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,903 Herman L. Zeller v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Van Brunt v. RauschenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  3. Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Stephens v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Phillips v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API