Legal Opinion
East River Savings Bank v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 1988No. 83 Civ. 8031 (RJW)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, East River Savings Bank (“the Bank”), has brought this action against the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and against Vanguard Holding Corporation (“Vanguard”), a New York corporation, seeking to recover losses it sustained when HUD refused to honor its application for insurance benefits on a residential mortgage it had purchased from Vanguard. HUD has moved, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the claims against it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 1 In the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc. v. American Tower Corp. (In Re Verestar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United States v. LongoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Bulk Oil (USA) Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Blum v. SchlegelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
- Advance Coating Technology, Inc. v. LEP Chemical Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.