Legal Opinion

State v. Portis

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2010No. CC 0802300706; CA A143558; SC S058179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Defendant seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision concluding that that court lacked jurisdiction over defendant’s appeal of a circuit court judgment. The circuit court had determined that defendant was not entitled to be considered by the Department of Corrections (DOC) for increased earned time credit under Oregon Laws 2009, chapter 660, sections 17 and 18. State v. Portis, 233 Or App 256, 225 P3d 841 (2010). We allowed defendant’s petition for review and, for the reasons stated below, now conclude that defendant’s claim on review is moot and that we must dismiss her petition for review.

I…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. PortisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James Kevin Blackerby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  2. James Kevin Blackerby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  3. State v. LeistikoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API