Legal Opinion

State v. Leistiko

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2012No. C072939CR; A144591Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a supplemental judgment that denies him consideration for additional earned time credits. In a single assignment of error, defendant argues that, in light of State v. Portis, 233 Or App 256, 225 P3d 841 (.Portis 7), rev dismissed as moot, 348 Or 559, 236 P3d 718 (Portis IT) (2010), the trial court had no authority to enter that supplemental judgment. In Portis I, we held that House Bill (HB) 3508 (2009) authorizes entry of a supplemental judgment when a trial court determines that an inmate is for additional credits, but does not authorize entry of a supplemental judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PortisOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. PortisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API