Legal Opinion

Tower v. Welker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ionia. (Person, J., presiding.) Replevin. Defendants bring error. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDurand, J.

This is an action of replevin, brought against the defendants to recover a stock of goods and merchandise, consisting mostly of groceries, provisions, store fixtures, and furniture, then in the Tower block in the city of Ionia.

The facts necessary to be stated are these: One Fred A. Tower, being the owner of the property now in controversy, and being justly indebted to Sarah J. Tower, the *333plaintiff, in tbe sum of $2,000, for money loaned to bim by her, did on April 7, 1890, execute and deliver to ber a chattel mortgage on tbe same, to secure tbe payment of tbe indebtedness above mentioned.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Abrams v. ErvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Eastman v. CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1832
  3. Hope v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Facey v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Malony v. MaharMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keeler v. DeoMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Drew v. Kemp-BrooksDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Kennedy v. Van Buren County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. North v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Stewart v. Royal Oak Township ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API