Legal Opinion

North v. City of Battle Creek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1915No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Calhoun; Cross, J. Assumpsit by Walter H. North, as executor of the estate of Duane C. Salisbury, deceased, against the city of Battle Creek for salary of decedent as city attorney. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

At the election held in the city of Battle Creek April 7, 1913, there were elected a mayor and five aldermen, who, with five aldermen holding over, constituted the common council. At the same election, a new city charter was submitted to and adopted by the electors. It is apparent, from certain provisions of the new charter, that it was contemplated it might or might not' be adopted. If not adopted, municipal affairs were to run on under the old charter; if adopted, such provision was made that there should be no municipal or official interim. If adopted, a commission was to be elected, at a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Board of Auditors v. BenoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hallgren v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Blain v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Scott v. CrumpMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morton v. City of AuroraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ake v. BookhammerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
  3. Dick v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Schara v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Weza v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API