Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Slentz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1951No. 4129PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action by Morris Bailey to recover damages for personal injury sustained as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by him and a truck driven by Paul Cannon within the scope of his employment by the remaining two defendants. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendants moved for a directed verdict, among others on the ground that Bailey’s evidence affirmatively established contributory negligence as a matter of law. This motion was denied. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the motion was renewed. The court reserved its ruling thereon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc. v. CashmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Hill v. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Sponable v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kanatser v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Portage II and Portage IV v. Bryant Petroleum Corp., Dr. Clarke N. SimmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Charles Jackson v. Wilson Trucking Corp., a Corporation, and Roy S. RexrodeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Jerrell Powell and Mrs. Sally Bargeron v. Lititz Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API