Legal Opinion
Kessel v. Public Service Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harvey, J.
In May 1983, respondent Long Island Lighting Company (hereinafter LILCO) filed with respondent Public Service Commission (hereinafter Commission) a request for a $366,000,000 annual electric revenue increase. The filing assumed that LILCO’s Shoreham nuclear plant in Suffolk County would be in service during the rate year ending in April 1985. After it became apparent that the Shoreham plant would not operate in the rate year, LILCO’s filing was suspended and new projections were made in December 1983. The revised filing requested $281,000,000 permanent rate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York State Council of Retail Merchants, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Abrams v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- St. Lawrence Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. CuomoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
- Colella v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Adt Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- County Of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.