Legal Opinion

State v. Matson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 15, 1986PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUNCAN, Judge.

After an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge held to be without merit all of petitioner’s claims of ineffective representation of counsel and dismissed the petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm the dismissal.

The petitioner, James H. Matson, was convicted of second degree murder by a Davidson County jury. He was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the penitentiary as a Range I offender. On direct appeal, we affirmed the conviction (State v. James H. Matson, C.C.A. No. 84-196-III (Tenn.Cr.App., Nashville, June 6, 1985)), and the Tennessee Supreme Court denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hellard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. State v. DraperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. State v. ChadwickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. Adrian Wilkerson v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API