Legal Opinion

State v. . Avant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnoe, J.

The defendant’s contention, presented by his first assignment of error on his appeal to this Court, that the indictment in this action is not valid, cannot be sustained. This assignment of error is based on defendant’s exception to the refusal of the trial judge to allow his motion to quash the indictment. The grounds for this motion were (1) that when returned into court by the grand jury, as provided by statute (C. S., 4611), the bill of indictment was not endorsed by the foreman of tbe grand jury or otherwise as “a true bill”; and (2) that tbe names of tbe witnesses for tbe State who were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. State v. . ShemwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API