Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 1972No. 8 Dlv. 465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIEFLIN, Chief Justice.

After demurrers were sustained both to the original single count complaint and the amended single count complaint of the appellant-plaintiff Howard J. Kirkpatrick, he suffered a non-suit and has appealed to this court for review of the judgment.

The appellant-plaintiff Howard Kirkpatrick brought this action based on material misrepresentation, claiming that certain persons had induced him to rely on a forged signature on a promissory note and a mortgage to his injury. The appellees*112defendants are Cecil White, June White (White’s wife), Herman Watson and C. M. Russell…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  2. Sims v. TigrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Peoples National Bank v. DixwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Holder v. Elmwood CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Harris v. Swanson & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dodd v. Nelda Stephenson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Johnny Spradlin Auto Parts, Inc. v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Cash v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API