Porter v. Oba, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentEdmonds, P. J.
I agree with the majority that, even when parol evidence of the circumstances of the contract is considered, there is no evidence that plaintiffs employment relationship with Oba, Inc. (Oba) was other than an at-will relationship. However, for the reasons that follow, I disagree with the majority’s ruling that plaintiffs claim for intentional interference with economic relations against McLain is legally cognizable. I would hold that, without accompanying evidence of tortious conduct, McLain’s alleged motive is not actionable, and I would affirm the trial court’s summary judgment ruling.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.