Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1899PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before Hon. E. D. McClelland.

1Opinion of the Court

There was testimony of negligence on the part of defendant, as the cause of the injury to plaintiff, and testimony showing the absence of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff.

The petition alleged that plaintiff, by reason of the negligence of defendant as set out, and of the injuries inflicted upon her, has been compelled to expend and become liable for the sum of $25 worth of medicines, and has paid and become liable to pay physician's bills to certain doctors in the sum of $125. There was no allegation that above sums were reasonable, and the first assignment is that the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WorthamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stewart v. International & G. N. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Edens-Birch Lumber Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Callan v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Dickey v. JacksonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Port City Lumber Co. v. MarkellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Temple Lumber Co. v. LivingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API