Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Celebrezze

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided July 28, 1965No. Civ. A. 4910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Defendant, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, has moved to dismiss this action on the basis that the appeal to this Court from an adverse decision of the Secretary was not made within the sixty days provided for in the applicable statute.

There is no dispute as to the time involved. Plaintiff’s complaint was filed sixty-one days after the notice of an adverse decision was mailed to plaintiff by the Secretary or his representative in Washington.

Counsel for plaintiff avers that the time should begin to run sixty days after receipt of the notice, not sixty days…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Cas. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Charles W. Jamieson v. Marion B. Folsom Now Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Knight v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
  4. Saxon v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
  5. Lillian Reiss v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eugene Whipp v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Kuenstler v. Occidental Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1968
  3. Robert N. Williams v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. United Jersey Bank/Central, N.A. v. Collated Products Corp. (In Re Collated Products Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  5. Barrett v. Eastern Iowa Community College DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API