Baker v. Carr
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Per curiam
The original plaintiffs and intervening plaintiffs, citizens and qualified voters residing in different areas of Tennessee, seek to challenge in this action under the equal protection and due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment the existing legislative apportionment in Tennessee. Briefly summarized, the contentions of the plaintiffs 1 are as follows:
The Constitution of Tennessee (Article 2, Sections 4, 5 and 6) directs the legislature at the expiration of each 10-year period after 1871 to make an enumeration of the qualified voters and to apportion the members of the legislature among…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Brown v. State Election Board of the OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Scholle v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.