Moss v. Burkhart
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The Pleadings
This class action is a sequel to Rad-ford v. Gary, D.C., 145 F.Supp. 541, in which another named plaintiff assailed the Oklahoma Apportionment Statutes for the election of the members to the Oklahoma Legislature, as a deprivation of the equal protection of the laws, vouchsafed to him by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Like the named plaintiff in the Radford case, the plaintiff here is a citizen and resident of Oklahoma, and a qualified voter of the most populous County in the State. As such representative citizen and voter, he…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Colegrove v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- MacDougall v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- South v. PetersSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sims v. FrinkDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1962
- Sincock v. DuffyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1963
- Lisco v. McNicholsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
- Wright v. RockefellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Butterworth v. DempseyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.