Legal Opinion

Barber & McMurry, Inc. v. Top-Flite Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 14, 1986PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this action, the trial judge entered judgment for architectural fees on behalf of plaintiff and refused to set aside the judgment in response to either a T.R.C.P., Rule 59 motion or a T.R.C.P., Rule 60 motion. Defendants have appealed.

The corporate defendant and Joseph B. Delozier, individual defendant, who was apparently chairman of the board of the corporation, were served with process on February 17, 1984. Plaintiff moved for a default judgment on the grounds the parties had failed to answer within the required time. On April 23, 1984, the corporate defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. ArcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Edwards v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  3. Barish v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Morrow v. DrumwrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Discover Bank v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. LooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Ferguson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  4. Cole Bryan Howell, III v. Cheryl RyerkerkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. Elliot v. Life of the South Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API