Legal Opinion

Barish v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 8, 1981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*954OPINION

CONNER, Judge.

(Filed with concurrence of participating judges)

The principal issue presented is whether the trial court erred by refusing to grant the plaintiff-appellant, Sylvia Barish,1 a continuance in order to seek counsel after the trial court had permitted her former lawyer to withdraw four days before trial. Plaintiff also contends the trial judge procedurally erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to T.R.C.P. 41.02 when she appeared pro se and offered no proof on the date of trial.

Mrs. Barish filed suit on May 17, 1979, claiming that certain of her improved…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gary William Holt v. Jerry Pitts, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. TysonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Tipton v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  5. Turner v. StewardDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Henry v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Presley v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Barber & McMurry, Inc. v. Top-Flite Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  5. In Re RockwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API