Legal Opinion

Obad v. Allstate Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Judgment and order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The motion, which was made on the face of the complaint, challenged its legal sufficiency in that it failed to state a cause of action. Thus we must accept the allegations of the complaint as true, and give the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences therefrom. The complaint states in substance that the defendant attempted to force and coerce the plaintiff to accept an offer of settlement in the amount of $6,250. This is combined with an allegation of a threat that if the offer should be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linscott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Koch v. Bell, Lewis & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Briggs v. WeeksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API